Woodmansee v. Stoneman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to allow separate voir dire of each juror because of widespread publicity
• noting that trial court is “powerless” to terminate parole as “[s]uch termination is the administrative function of the parole board”
• affirming sentence of \not more than seven nor less than six years\ over defendant's objection that minimum and maximum terms violated statute's prohibition on fixed terms
• affirming sentence of “not more than seven nor less than six years” over defendant’s objection that minimum and maximum terms violated statute’s prohibition on fixed terms
• affirming sentence with difference of one year between maximum and minimum terms
• affirming sentence with difference of one year between maximum and minimum terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).