Skip to main content
· 12/14/2011

Woodmancy v. Framco, Inc.

Citations

  • 387 S.W.3d 286
  • 2011 Ark. App. 785
  • 2011 WL 6189461
  • 2011 Ark. App. LEXIS 833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an unpublished opinion “can have at most a persuasive effect and is not binding”
  • “[T]he rule of contra proferentem, i.e., that an agreement is construed strictly against the drafter, should be used in interpreting insurance contracts.”
  • no expectation of coverage exists when no premiums are charged
  • “To deny, contest, or oppose (an allegation or claim)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agree, Gruber, Pittman, Vaught

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.