· 12/14/2011
Woodmancy v. Framco, Inc.
Citations
- 387 S.W.3d 286
- 2011 Ark. App. 785
- 2011 WL 6189461
- 2011 Ark. App. LEXIS 833
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an unpublished opinion “can have at most a persuasive effect and is not binding”
- “[T]he rule of contra proferentem, i.e., that an agreement is construed strictly against the drafter, should be used in interpreting insurance contracts.”
- no expectation of coverage exists when no premiums are charged
- “To deny, contest, or oppose (an allegation or claim)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agree, Gruber, Pittman, Vaught
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.