Woodley v. Stolle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that rounding practices comply with 7 federal regulations when they favor neither overpayment nor underpayment
• noting that courts look to the federal Fair 20 Labor Standards Act to interpret “regular rates” under California law
• holding time spent in office before shift was not \hours worked\ where employer suggested, but did not require, that employees arrive early

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).