Skip to main content
· 8/31/1992

Woodley v. Myers Capital Corp.

Citations

  • 835 P.2d 239
  • 67 Wash. App. 328
  • 1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorneys who had represented debtors in bankruptcy proceedings could bring a state court action to recover fees
  • stating that a nonparty is in privity with a party for res judicata purposes if the party adequately represented the nonparty’s interests in prior proceeding
  • stating that a nonparty is in privity with a party for res judicata purposes if the party adequately represented the nonparty’s interests in prior proceeding
  • \The doctrine of res judicata applies with full force in bankruptcy proceedings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pekelis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.