Skip to main content
· 2/14/2024

Woodland v. D.C. Department of Corrections Medical Staff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding 13 that petitioner, the target of private attempts to collect debt, did not suffer from political 14 persecution
  • \[Petitioner's] contention that the BIA applied an incorrect standard is a question of law reviewed de novo. \
  • “[Petitioner’s] contention that the BIA applied an incorrect standard is a question of law reviewed de novo.”
  • “[Petitioner’s] contention that the BIA applied an incorrect standard is a question of law reviewed de novo.”
  • “Violation of a regulation renders the deportation unlawful only if the violation preju- diced the interests of the alien which are protected by the reg- ulation.” (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Amit P. Mehta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.