Woodland Park Hospital, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing plaintiffs to use leading questions when examining former agent of defendants whom defendants had discharged
• finding partner derivatively liable for punitive damages for his partner’s acts under North Carolina uniform partnership provision because acts were carried out in ordinary course of partnership business
• plaintiff filing action seeking damages based upon G.S. § 75-1.1, or alternatively recission, not entitled to trebling of award since plaintiff later elected restitution and district court instructed jury upon same
• in unfair and deceptive trade practices action where plaintiff elected recission and dam ages were not assessed, purchase price amount returned to plaintiffs not subject to being trebled under N.C.G.S. § 75-16
• witness concluded that land developers never intended to do what they promise
• not- ing that sometimes the characterization of testimony as opinion evidence may be misleading when the focus should be upon rational inferences drawn from facts of which the witness has personal knowl- edge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).