Woodland Market Realty Company v. City of Cleveland, East 55th-Woodland Improvement Company, and Frank M. Brennan, Cuyahoga County Treasurer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing plaintiff-appellant’s reliance on cases concerning a physical intrusion on property, including Eyherabide, in a case predicated on a taking theory involving no actual invasion
• rejecting a de facto takings claim where the urban renewal project “never included the plaintiff’s property”
• commercial leaseholder’s diminished property value occasioned by city’s urban renewal project and consequent loss of customers does not constitute fourteenth amendment \taking\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).