Skip to main content
· 3/30/1951

Wooding v. Sawyer

Citations

  • 229 P.2d 535
  • 38 Wash. 2d 381
  • 1951 Wash. LEXIS 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where appellants secured substantial relief on appeal and respondent prevailed on the major issue of fraud and where more than 90 percent of the briefs were devoted to the issue of fraud, the respondent received costs regarding that item, but otherwise neither party received costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.