Woodhouse v. Farmers Union Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that policy exclusion for loss caused by intentional act of “an insured” barred recovery by innocent insured
• holding that policy exclusion for loss caused by intentional act of \an insured\ barred recovery by innocent insured
• holding “an insured” unambiguously bars coverage to an innocent coinsured
• same intentional loss exclusion as in the instant case “clearly and unequivocally” makes obligations joint
• policy exclusion for loss caused by intentional act of insured bars innocent insured from recovering for personal property destroyed by co-insured’s arson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).