Skip to main content
· 2/20/1974

Woodford v. Municipal Court

Citations

  • 37 Cal. App. 3d 874
  • 112 Cal. Rptr. 773
  • 1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 1179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recent determination by federal court that film was not obscene estopped prosecution of same film by local officials within geographical boundaries of that federal district
  • prosecution of petitioners with regard to their showing of allegedly obscene film not collaterally estopped due to fact another person had been acquitted in obscenity prosecution pertaining to same film in which scienter was admitted
  • prosecution of petitioners with regard to their showing of allegedly obscene film not collaterally estopped due to fact another person had been acquitted in obscenity prosecution pertaining to same film in which scienter was admitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ault

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.