Woodford v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a claimant's performance of basic self-care activities does not contradict assertions of disability
• explaining that a claimant's performance of basic self-care activities does not contradict assertions of disability
• concluding ALJ erred in concluding claimant could perform sedentary work because she cooked, shopped for herself, and used public transportation
• explaining that a claimant's performance of basic self-care activities does not contradict assertions of disability
• explaining that a claimant's performance of basic self-care activities does not contradict assertions of disability
• remanding where the ALJ’s RFC determination rested on the claimant’s daily activities and “no [supporting] medical evidence was presented”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).