Woodcock v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the DCHRA, the statute of limitations begins to run when the “plaintiff is given unequivocal notice of the [adverse] decision, not on the effective date of the decision”
• finding that internal 17 emails exchanging “price information” between defendants support an inference of an ongoing 18 conspiracy to fix prices
• limitations period begins “when the ‘plaintiff is given unequivocal notice’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).