· 4/20/1990
Woodbury v. Courtney
Citations
- 391 S.E.2d 293
- 239 Va. 651
- 6 Va. Law Rep. 2226
- 1990 Va. LEXIS 66
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding exclusion of late-identified expert as discovery sanction under Rule 4:12 because “[f]ive months is more than sufficient time for a litigant to identify expert witnesses”
- \The purpose of the order was to allow the litigants to discover the expert witnesses' opinions in preparation for trial.\
- \Five months is more than sufficient time for a litigant to identify expert witnesses.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hassell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.