· 7/13/2011
Woodard v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Citations
- 801 F. Supp. 2d 1363
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75171
- 2011 WL 2711203
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where the “circumstances” of the spoliation were “sufficient to support an inference of bad faith,” the appropriate sanction was a jury instruction on spoliation
- allowing to go to the jury for a determination of bad faith the fact that Wal-Mart preserved the wrong video footage and its claims adjuster failed to review the tape until after Wal-Mart had recorded over the pertinent footage
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: C. Ashley Royal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.