Skip to main content
· 7/13/2011

Woodard v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP

Citations

  • 801 F. Supp. 2d 1363
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75171
  • 2011 WL 2711203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the “circumstances” of the spoliation were “sufficient to support an inference of bad faith,” the appropriate sanction was a jury instruction on spoliation
  • allowing to go to the jury for a determination of bad faith the fact that Wal-Mart preserved the wrong video footage and its claims adjuster failed to review the tape until after Wal-Mart had recorded over the pertinent footage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: C. Ashley Royal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.