Woodard v. COM., PA. BD. OF PROB. & PAR.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a recommitment order and recalculation order are separate final appealable orders and to challenge the timeliness of a revocation hearing, a timely appeal must be taken from the recommitment order
• explaining that a recommitment order deals with the award of backtime and a recalculation order cannot be recomputed “until the inmate is returned to state custody” and is final as to the propriety of the recommitment itself
• wherein this Court held that the parolee had waived the issues relating to the recommitment order and could not properly raise the same issues in a timely appeal of the Parole Board’s recalculation order
• wherein we held that the petitioner had waived the issues relating to a final, appealable recommitment order and could not properly raise the same issues in a timely appeal of the Board’s recalculation order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).