Wood v. Walton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “where the gravamen of the [FDUTPA] claim sounds in fraud, . . . Rule 9(b
• holding that the first factor weighed 14 against imposing a special relationship where the defendant did not develop goods and services for 15 the plaintiffs’ “specific benefit, above and beyond what was offered to all consumers”
• holding “[p]laintiff’s claim could be based on an alleged breach of an ‘agreement to negotiation’” (citing to Baskin Robbins)
• holding “[p]laintiff’s claim could be based on an alleged breach of an ‘agreement to negotiation’” (citing to Baskin Robbins)
• finding that “fraud-based omission claims” under the FAL were adequately pleaded
• denying a motion to dismiss a FAL claim where defendant had claimed to take reasonable steps to secure users’ personal information, but omitted information about deficiencies in the product’s security system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).