Wood v. State Road Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding even an “admittedly terse” justification sufficient under plain error review
• affirming an upward variance based on the \short time that had elapsed between the appellant's release from prison and his commission of a new . . . crime; the serious (and repetitive) nature of the new offense; the danger presented to the community . . . and the need for deterrence\
• \There are typically 'a broad range of reasonable sentences that can apply in any given case.'\ (quoting United States v. Martin, 520 F.3d 87, 96 (1st Cir. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).