Wood v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the denial of the motion for a continuance was not an abuse of discretion where the appellant made no showing regarding the character or anticipated duration of the illness and made no application for attachment of the witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Adams v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1928-04-09· cited 48×
• Morgan v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-05-21· cited 24×
• Harris v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1925-10-26· cited 12×
• Eddy v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1924-06-30· cited 11×
• McDonald v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1923-09-24· cited 9×
• Edwards v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1929-11-11· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ware v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1909-10-11· cited 34×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1891-02-21· cited 28×
• Fields v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1922-06-12· cited 16×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1923-01-15· cited 8×
• Tarkington v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1922-06-26· cited 7×
• Priest v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1922-06-12· cited 1×