Wood v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding objection was not specific because it did “not specify which extraneous offenses [appellant] was referring to,” and he “testified to several”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Valdes-Fuerte v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1994-12-07· cited 82×
• Werner v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1984-10-04· cited 9×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-11-17· cited 4×
• Starling v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-07· cited 4×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-01-23
• Darren Latodd Houston v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2024-07-03