Wood v. Mayo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the sentencing guidelines “have no binding effect, create no presumption in sentencing, and do not predominate over other sentencing factors” (citation omitted)
• stating that a claim that the sentencing court imposed a sentence outside of the guidelines, without specifying sufficient reasons, presents a substantial question
• stating that Appellant was born in Germany but has not lived there since he was a child
• stating that “[a] claim that the sentencing court imposed a sentence outside of the guidelines without specifying sufficient reasons presents a substantial question for our review.”
• stating that “[a] claim that the sentencing court imposed a sentence outside of the guidelines without specifying sufficient reasons presents a substantial question for our review.”
• stating that “[a] claim that the sentencing court imposed a sentence outside of the guidelines without specifying sufficient reasons presents a substantial question for our review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).