Wood v. Law

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Montana's Medical Marijuana Act, MCA 50-46-205(2)(b
• “The [Medical Marijuana Act] MMA specifically provides that it cannot be construed to No. 11-1227 Casias v. Wal-Mart, et al. Page 11 require employers ‘to accommodate the medical use of marijuana in any workplace.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).