Wood v. Idaho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the principles of Rule 10b-5 in determining whether section 14(e) had been violated
• “These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed....”
• \These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed \
• dismissal of indictment proper if government needlessly relied on hearsay as exercise of court's supervisory power
• in absence of some showing that integrity of grand jury • proceedings has been compromised indictment will not be overturned on appeal
• mandamus should not be utilized to direct or influence the exercise of discretion of a governmental official

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).