Wood v. Everett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “the Goss rule applies to each individual suspension, rather 27 than to the suspensions in aggregate.”
• dismissing negligent infliction of emotional distress claim because plaintiff’s arguments mirrored her claim for negligent supervision
• dismissing negligent infliction of emotional distress claim because the plaintiff's arguments mirrored her claim for negligent supervision
• dismissing equal protection claim where the plaintiff provided only a conclusory assertion that he was treated differently than his nondisabled peers but failed to identify any similarly situated comparator
• granting summary judgment to defendants on NIED claim because it “mirror[ed]” another tort claim
• “Plaintiffs argue that their substantive due process rights were violated because, despite their many complaints about J.T.'s treatment, defendants did not prevent the ongoing bullying”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).