Skip to main content
· 4/23/1895

Wood v. Ethridge

Citations

  • 62 Mo. App. 127
  • 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the violation of an applicable statute constitutes negligence per se
  • recognizing that the violation of an applicable statute constitutes negligence per se
  • recognizing that the violation of an applicable statute constitutes negligence per se
  • recognizing that the violation of an applicable statute constitutes negligence per se
  • \It is not the duty of the [circuit] court to weigh the testimony in ruling on a motion for a directed verdict.\
  • “A trial court’s rulings in matters related to discovery generally will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biggs, Other

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.