Wood v. Diamonds Sports Bar & Grill, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that arguments raised in a reply brief, and not in a principal brief, are not properly before us and may be stricken from the brief
• concluding that arguments raised in a reply brief and not in a principal brief are not properly before us and may be stricken from the brief
• declining to reach issue raised to but not addressed by the district court
• “If an argument is raised in a reply brief but not raised in an appellant’s main brief, and it exceeds the scope of the respondent’s brief, it is not properly before this court and may be stricken from the reply brief.”
• “If an argument is raised in a reply brief but not raised in an appellant’s main brief, and it exceeds the scope of the respondent’s brief, it is not properly before this court and may be stricken from the reply brief.”
• “If an argument is raised in a reply brief but not raised in an appellant’s main brief, and it exceeds the scope of the respondent’s brief, it is not properly before this court and may be stricken from the reply brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).