Wood v. Bright (In Re Bright)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the “relation-back” provisions of Washington law, the panel found that the debtor “had no interest in property to transfer and thus the [djisclaimer does not satisfy the fraudulent conveyance provisions of § 548”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).