Wood v. A. Wilbert's Sons Shingle & Lumber Co.
Citations
- 226 U.S. 384
- 33 S. Ct. 125
- 57 L. Ed. 264
- 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2160
Syllabus
<p>Where defendant files a formal appearance ajad simultaneously files an exception to.the jurisdiction, the two papers should be considered together, and as such cannot be regarded as a consent to submit to -the jurisdiction in a ease where consent is necessary.</p> <p>An objection that the exception and demurrer did not comply with Rule 31 owing to failure to make affidavit that they were not interposed for delay, if not raised in the court below or assigned as'error, cannot be raised in this court.</p> <p>The District Court has not jurisdiction in behalf of the trustee in bankruptcy to recover assets of the bankrupt from a third person under a revocatory action allowed under the law of Louisiana, of an insolvent, without the consent of the defendant, under the Bankruptcy Act as Amended- by the act of February 5,1903, c. 487, § 8, 32 Stat. 797.'</p> <p>This court will assume that all the amendments to different parts of the same act of Congress passed at the same time were intended not to conflict but to be in accord as provisions for different situations.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting the statutory interpreta- tion “which can ‘most fairly be said to be . . . harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.