· 2/18/2022

Wood Cty. Dog Warden v. Lathrop

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 480

Syllabus

Because the warden established by clear and convincing evidence that the subject dog was not provoked by the victim prior to biting the victim, the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant dog warden's objections to the magistrate's decision reversing its dangerous dog designation. R.C. 955.11 R.C. 955.222.

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.