Wong Shing v. M/V Mardina Trader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiff must pres ent evidence sufficient to raise the inference that his protected activity was the likely reason for the adverse action to establish a retaliation claim
• finding essential to showing causation 21 is “evidence that the employer was aware that the plaintiff had engaged in protected 22 activity”
• noting it is “essential to a causal link” that the employer was aware of the protected activity
• “Essential to a causal link is evidence that the 11 employer was aware that the plaintiff had engaged in the protected activity.”
• “Essential to a causal link is evidence that the employer was aware that the plaintiff had engaged in the protected activity.”
• “Essential to a causal link is 22 evidence that the employer was aware that the plaintiff had engaged in the protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).