Wong Ken v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insured submitted claims for $85,000 in living expenses after Hurricane Andrew when insured actually stayed in damaged house
• “[T]he clause which voids coverage if the insured makes an intentional misrepresentation ‘after a loss'-that is, as here, in making a claim-is valid and enforceable.”
• summary judgment proper as to whether insured made material misrepresentation as a matter of law
• “[t]he clause which voids coverage if the insured makes an intentional misrepresentation ‘after a loss’ — that is, as here, in making a claim— is valid and enforceable”
• “There is no question that the clause which voids coverage if the insured makes an intentional misrepresentation ‘after a loss’—that is, as here, in making a claim—is valid and enforceable.”
• clause which voids coverage for intentional misrepresentation is valid and enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).