Skip to main content
· 1/17/1990

Wonder Labs, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Citations

  • 728 F. Supp. 1058
  • 14 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1645
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 584
  • 1990 WL 2924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing an unfair competition claim where the plaintiff had sent the defendant a cease-and-desist letter prior to the litigation
  • “The fact that, prior to the commencement of the lawsuit, defendant did not abandon its project at plaintiff’s suggestion, does not itself evidence a lack of good faith.”
  • “The standard for unfair competition under New York law is very similar to the standards of the Lanham Act. Thus, the defense that the defendant’s use of the mark is purely descriptive and not as a trademark equally precludes recovery for common law unfair competition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goettel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.