Skip to main content
· 7/3/1986

Wonda Enis v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Illinois, Defendant

Citations

  • 795 F.2d 39
  • 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,295
  • 1 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 499
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The words ‘include’ and ‘such as’ show that the specific instances are illustrative, not exhaustive.”
  • “our policy is to give some though of course not complete deference to the interpretation of state law by a district judge sitting in the state whose law is in question”
  • “The words “include” and “such as” show that the specific instances are illustrative, not exhaustive.”
  • “The words “include” and “such as” show that the specific instances are illustrative, not exhaustive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Pell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.