Wonda Day v. Northern Indiana Public Service Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to strike pursuant to Rule 28(c) where portion of fact statement was argumen- tative and unsupported by citation
• granting motion to strike where appellant’s statement of facts was argumentative and unsupported by citation
• “Rule 28(c) is vital to efficient performance of the appellate task.”
• “Rule 28(c) is vital to efficient performance of the appellate task.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).