Skip to main content
· 6/15/2010

WON PAK v. Harris

Citations

  • 313 S.W.3d 454
  • 2010 WL 1494769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an attorney’s pecuniary interest in obtaining a legal fee is “insufficient to allege the type of dishonesty or intentional deception” necessary support a breach of fiduciary duty claim
  • allegation that attorney failed to disclose that he did not draft the assignments did not state a claim for breach of fiduciary duty or fraud, rather than professional negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morris, O'Neill, Fillmore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.