Skip to main content
· 12/13/1995

Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. Voinovich

Citations

  • 911 F. Supp. 1051
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19009
  • 1995 WL 756857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing examples of relevant exception will apply only if all of the following conditions are psychological harms
  • enjoining abortion regulation; holding that “[a]s far as the Defendants’ interests are concerned, a preliminary injunction will merely maintain the status quo while the constitutionality of this legislation is decided.”
  • discussing testimony about the mental health effects for pregnant women who cannot obtain abortions
  • discussing testimony about the mental health effects for pregnant women who cannot obtain abortions
  • finding Dr. Giles’ criticisms of the D & X procedure unpersuasive
  • D & X procedure “appears to pose less risk to maternal health than any other alternative”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.