Womack v. Rail Link, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff’s letter to defendant that referred to stock participation as part of plaintiff’s compensation “would be inadmissible . . . to prove the existence of the contract as alleged by plaintiff because of its self-serving nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).