Wolvos v. Meyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mere agreement to agree at some future time is not enforceable
• noting that “[t]he law is well established that a mere agreement to agree at some future time is not enforceable”
• noting that “only essential terms need be included in order to render a contract enforceable”
• stating that enforcement of incomplete or ambiguous writing creates a substantial danger that the court will enforce something neither party intended
• finding that the parties agreed to certain enforceable terms of an agreement with the expectation that they would execute a complete agreement in the future, and “a mere reference to a more formalized contract does not void the presently existing agreement”
• “The law is well established that a mere agreement to agree at some future time is not enforceable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).