Wolt v. Sherwood, a Division of Harsco Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nonsettling parties are not prejudiced because the ‘expertise’ will be made available, in spite of a settlement, if the nonsettling parties can show ‘exceptional circumstances’ under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(B).”
• construing settlement agreement as not precluding settling defendant’s counsel from later representing nonsettling defendant against same plaintiff and opining that if settlement agreement contained such a restriction, it would violate Utah Rule of Professional Conduct 5.6(b)
• “The rule is designed to promote fairness by precluding unreasonable access to an opposing party’s diligent trial preparation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).