Wolski v. Wandel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• layperson could not be expected to know, without assistance of expert testimony, whether attorney was negligent in counseling client to settle litigation
• “[a] client who has agreed to the settlement of an action is not barred from recov- ering against his or her attorney for malpractice if the client can establish that the settlement agreement was the product of the attorney’s negligence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).