· 4/11/1936
Wollard v. Peterson
Citations
- 143 Kan. 566
- 56 P.2d 476
- 1936 Kan. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “an unsworn, unsigned affidavit may not be considered by the trial court on a motion for summary disposition.”
- holding that an unsworn, unsigned affidavit cannot be considered on a motion for summary disposition
- holding that an unsworn, unsigned affidavit cannot be considered on a motion for summary disposition
- holding that “an unsworn, unsigned affidavit may not be considered by the trial court on a motion for summary disposition.”
- noting that a trial court may not consider an unsigned, unsworn affidavit when deciding a motion for summary disposition
- noting that a trial court may not consider an unsigned, unsworn affidavit when deciding a motion for summary disposition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hutchison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.