Wolfson v. Wolfson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that disqualification is required where the trial judge’s comments suggested that she had prejudged the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wolfson v. Wolfson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-24
• Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority v. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barnett v. Barnett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 20×
• Kopel v. Kopel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-11· cited 15×
• Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Capua
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-30· cited 5×
• Van v. Unifund CCR, LLC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-16· cited 4×