WOLFPACK ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Arrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that changing name of plaintiff on application for confirmation of an arbitration award was not the addition of another party to the suit but rather an allowable correction of a misnomer
• holding that Uniform Superior Court Rule 14 and OCGA § 9-11-41 (b) “restrict the dismissal of an action for failure to appear at the call of the case to one without prejudice” (punctuation omitted)
• holding that Uniform Superior Court Rule 14 and OCGA § 9-11-41 (b) “restrict the dismissal of an action for failure to appear at the call of the case to one without prejudice” (punctuation omitted)
• “A dismissal with prejudice based solely on want of prosecution or failure to appear is improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).