Skip to main content
· 3/21/2005

Wolford v. Pinnacol Assurance

Citations

  • 107 P.3d 947
  • 2005 WL 451913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that we avoid interpretations that render statutory provisions redundant or superfluous
  • discussing in general the means a court utilizes to interpret statutes
  • “[W]e must interpret a statute to give effect to all its parts and avoid interpretations that render statutory provisions redundant or superfluous.”
  • we must avoid a statutory interpretation that renders any provision redundant or superfluous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martinez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.