Wolff v. Rare Medium, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in pleading the elements of the contract, “a plaintiff must identify what provisions of the contract were breached as a result of the acts at issue”
• explaining that “a plaintiff must identify what provisions of the contract were breached as a result of the acts at issue”
• highlighting plaintiffs’ failure to plead any allegations regarding “rights and obligations” under the Morgan Stanley contract in dismissing the initial complaint and granting leave to replead
• dismissing breach of contract claim because “the complaint fails to provide [defendant] notice of the contractual provision allegedly breached”
• dismissing breach-of-contract claim because plaintiffs failed to identify language imposing obligation on defendants
• “[A] plaintiff must identify what provisions of the contract were breached as a result of the acts at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).