Skip to main content
· 6/16/2000

Wolff v. Mahrer

Citations

  • 273 A.D.2d 812
  • 709 N.Y.S.2d 310
  • 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in determining whether ten days' notice to cancel a distributorship contract was unconscionable, court would not consider plaintiffs subsequent expansion and expenses incurred in reliance on continued relationship with defendant
  • in determining whether ten days' notice to cancel a distributorship contract was unconscionable, court would not consider plaintiff's subsequent expansion and expenses incurred in reliance on continued relationship with defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.