Skip to main content
· 1/30/1963

Wolff v. Du Puis

Citations

  • 378 P.2d 707
  • 233 Or. 317
  • 1963 Ore. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that it is “well settled that the husband and wife are not necessarily in privity”
  • finding that it is “well settled that the husband and wife are not necessarily in privity”
  • “[T]he cause of action for loss of consortium in favor of the spouse of an injured person is an independent action which stands on its own footing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAllister, Rossman, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin, Lusk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.