· 1/30/1963
Wolff v. Du Puis
Citations
- 378 P.2d 707
- 233 Or. 317
- 1963 Ore. LEXIS 277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that it is “well settled that the husband and wife are not necessarily in privity”
- finding that it is “well settled that the husband and wife are not necessarily in privity”
- “[T]he cause of action for loss of consortium in favor of the spouse of an injured person is an independent action which stands on its own footing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAllister, Rossman, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin, Lusk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.