Skip to main content
· 1/3/1905

Wolff v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 196 U.S. 152
  • 25 S. Ct. 198
  • 49 L. Ed. 426
  • 1905 U.S. LEXIS 888

Syllabus

<p>An object which subserves the use of streets need not necessarily be considered an obstruction although it may occupy some part of the space of the street.</p> <p>The duty of a city to specially illuminate and guard the place where an object is depends upon whether such object is an unlawful obstruction.</p> <p>Under §§ 222 and 233, Rev. Stat., District of Columbia, the District is not prohibited from permitting a stepping-stone on any part of the street because it is an obstruction per se nor is the District required to specially illuminate and guard the place where .such stepping-stone is located.</p>

Judges: McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.