Wolfe v. Menard, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a reviewing court is not a depository in which the appealing party may dump the burden of argument
• noting that a reviewing court is not a depository in which the appealing party may dump the burden of argument
• “A conclusory assertion, without supporting analysis, is not enough” to constitute an argument under Rule 341(h)(7)
• a party “must argue the points that he or she raises, or they are waived. [Citation.] A conclusory assertion, without supporting analysis, is not enough.”
• “The appellant must argue the points that he or she raises, or they are waived. [Citation.] A conclusory assertion, without supporting analysis, is not enough.”
• a party “must argue the points that he or she raises, or they are waived. [Citation.] A conclusory assertion, without supporting analysis, is not enough.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).