Wolfe v. Dyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant neither knew nor should have known that its conduct violated RSA chapter 91-A due, in part, to the state of case law
• concluding that defendant neither knew nor should have known that its conduct violated RSA chapter 91-A due, in part, to the state of case law
• concluding that defendant neither knew nor should have known it violated RSA chapter 91-A based, in part, on “the law in this area”
• upholding denial of attorney’s fees because office of the legislative budget assistant neither knew nor should have known that its conduct violated the statute, in part because of the state of the case law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).