Wolfe v. Davison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming the applicability of § 301 to individuals but not deciding the question because the contacts with the individual were too insubstantial
• declining to exercise general jurisdiction over New York-based president of a nonresident corporation because his contacts with the state were on his employer’s behalf
• assuming the applicability of § 301 to individuals but not deciding the question
• a plaintiff may not rely solely on the plaintiffs own activity in New York for purposes of CPLR § 302
• “defendant was doing business in New York since it engaged directly in its corporate activity with respect to New York accounts”
• jurisdiction exists where there is sustained, systematice sales activity by three representatives in New York

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).